APSSA / SAAPI Friday, 4 October 2013 07h00-10h00 TEA & REGISTRATION JOPENING AND WELCOME JOINT SESSION : CHAIR Prof Sarel Malan o i 10h00-10h15 Opening and introduction of Minister of Health Prof Sarel Malan (UWC) Theuns Botha (Minister of Health, Western Cape) S 11h00-11h30 Key challenges faced in each sector ICPA-Sham Moodley : Academy-Dr Shirley-Anne Boschmans : SA
- A |
J |K |
U |V |
Nextions.comOne-on-One Implementing Inclusion
A conversation between Exelon Corp. and
Nextions on effecting top-down change
How do the concepts of diversity and inclusion truly affect the way companies do business today? To answer this question, we turned to Nicole M. Durham, director of Diversity and Inclusion at nd Arin N. Reeves, Ph.D, pre consulting firm specializing in leadership and inclusion strategies. Ms. Reeves has been advising Exelon in several of their key diversity and inclusion efforts at Exelon Corporation for almost a year and a half, and has worked closely with Ms. Durham in her current role, as well as in her former role as executive assistant to the senior vice president and chief financial officer, Exelon Corporation. We asked Ms. Durham to identify questions that she felt are at the core of the discussions on diversity and inclusion in many large corporations today; here, Ms. Reeves answers her concerns. Nicole M. Durham Often times, we hear diversity and inclusion defined and discussed in
varying ways, even within the same company. Simply put, how should an organization define
Dr. Arin N. Reeves Defining these terms, and understanding the difference between diversity
and inclusion, is a critical step in both creating and sustaining diversity and inclusion, often
referred to as D&I, in organizations.
Diversity is the demographical composition within organizations – it is the “visible who” of which you are informed by who is overrepresented, adequately represented and underrepresented based on national, local or industry demographics. Diversity is also about the “invisible who,” consisting of individual differences in work styles, perspectives and experiences. Inclusion is what you do. It’s how people in the organization treat each other, communicate with each other and rely on each other as members of a team. You need to be inclusive in order to sustain diversity. Many organizations start with diversity (via hiring) and believe that if they “get enough diversity,” they will become inclusive automatically. This is what results in the “revolving door” of recruitment-attrition, recruitment-attrition. Our research and experience shows pretty unequivocally that you have to start with ensuring an inclusive workplace and then growing a diverse workforce. You should define diversity broadly to include identity, ability and experiences, and you should make sure that diversity is understood as related to but separate from inclusion. Ms. Durham We hear a lot today about “advancing the D&I strategy” or “taking D&I to the
next level” at an organization. In simple terms, what does that mean for today’s organizations?
Dr. Reeves The next level definitely starts with updating the vocabulary and awareness about
what D&I means today. D&I, for example, is not anti-discrimination or affirmative action. It is
about creating representative demographics and perspectives, and about ensuring an inclusive
culture in how leaders lead, managers manage and how everyone communicates and feels
The next level is about being, working and leading in a way that makes sense in the 21st century, and it often does start with changing the way we talk about D&I. The next level also involves integrating inclusion into all that an organization does. Every person in the organization should know how they should be contributing to an inclusive workplace and how they’ll be held accountable if the contribution doesn’t happen. In other words, inclusion should look and feel like a true organizational value like excellence, ethics or innovation. It’s not a “nice to do.” It has to be a “must do.” Ms. Durham Many companies that have been recognized for their D&I efforts offer employee
networking groups, sometimes referred to as “affinity groups,” “employee resource groups” or
“business advisory groups.” What is, or should be, the main purpose of these groups? Are they as
relevant today as when they began to emerge 20 to 30 years ago?
Dr. Reeves The name changes themselves – affinity group, employee network group, employee
resource group, business resource group and finally business advisory group – signify the
evolving structure and function of these networks. We’ve found that companies that start with
identifying the objectives they want these groups to accomplish end up with groups that are
effective for both the members of the groups as well as the organizations.
From a networking perspective, it does make sense to “manufacture” a network where one does not organically exist. For example, if there are not a lot of women in leadership, it makes sense to have a women’s network; the senior women would not otherwise “run into” other senior women in the hallways, and the junior women may benefit from the collective experiences of the senior women through a network. From an employee resource or advisory group perspective, a group of people representing a certain community, race, ethnicity, language and so on may be helpful to the company in understanding purchasing habits, community needs, global perspectives, et cetera of that group. So, the groups become sources of information and insight to the organization. Groups can also be constructed as pathways into supporting a community or as channels to improve communications with specific communities. The specific objectives need to be clearly articulated, and the formation and sustained support of these groups needs to be tied to those objectives in order for these groups to enhance the inclusion in the organization, instead of exacerbating lines of division that may already exist. Ms. Durham Like many companies, Exelon has come to recognize the need to ensure that all
segments of our employee population feel fully included in the workplace. What are some
strategies that companies can employ to ensure their D&I efforts effectively support an inclusive
culture and are not perceived as excluding a majority group?
Dr. Reeves If the vocabulary around D&I is properly calibrated and communicated, majority
groups (i.e. men, whites, etc.) should be actively engaged in all D&I efforts at all times. That
said, since many companies still think of D&I in terms of “helping the blacks and Hispanics” or
“helping women achieve work life balance” or “helping those affected by –isms,” any person
who does not fit into those categories may feel excluded. On the other hand, if you think and talk
about D&I as creating a culture where every single person can fully maximize their talent, you
can integrate aspects of diversity such as generational diversity, religious diversity, diversity of
learning/work styles, diverse needs of different family structures, et cetera. Creating an inclusive
culture focuses on holding leaders accountable for leading everyone effectively, holding
evaluation systems for being fair for everyone, and enforcing equal access to advancement
opportunities for everyone. When D&I is communicated in that way, it doesn’t lead to the
feelings of exclusion and frustration that majority groups face when D&I is discussed and
implemented in outmoded ways.
Another aspect to being fully inclusive in the way D&I is articulated and communicated is to have an updated “business case” for D&I. Any effective (and inclusive) business case should focus on how diverse perspectives make a team stronger and more productive. A narrow business case that focuses on just selling more to minority consumers or female clients exacerbates the divisions instead of creating real D&I. Pictured above: Dr. Arin N. Reeves (left) and Nicole M. Durham
Documento descargado de http://www.elsevier.es el 14/12/2012. Copia para uso personal, se prohíbe la transmisión de este documento por cualquier medio o formato. BRIEF REPORTS E. Valverde Molina, V. González Muñiz, J. Gómez-Maldonado, and I. Muñoz Castillo Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain Abstract el inhibidor de la bomba de protones más estable a pH ác