Mini Review Open Access Pharmacogenomics: Advent of personalized medicine Lipika Sahoo* and Richa Nath*
Lifeintelect Consultancy Pvt. Ltd., Marathahalli, Bangalore 560037, India.
Received: 20 November 2013 Accepted: 15 December 2013 Published online: 31 December 2013
Abstract Pharmacogenomics is the technology that analyses how genetic makeup affects an individual’s response to drugs. Pharmacogenomics helps to predict response to a medication and negative side effects. It aims to develop effective, safe drug and optimize drug therapy with respect to the patients’ genotype which leads to maximum efficacy and minimal adverse effect. Pharmacogenomics combines knowledge of genes, proteins and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to speed the discovery of drug response markers. It has implications in diseases like heart diseases, cancer, asthma, HIV, depression and many other common diseases. Key words: Pharmacogenomics, personalized medicine, drug response, single nucleotide polymorphisms, drug response markers, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic. Introduction
Pharmacogenomics combines pharmacology and genomics.
Pharmacogenomics combines knowledge of genes,
It is the technology that analyses how genetic makeup affects
proteins and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to
an individual’s response to drugs (1). It deals with the
speed the discovery of drug response markers. It helps in
influence of genetic variation on drug response in patients
identifying drug target, drug metabolism or disease
by analysing the gene expression or single-nucleotide
pathways. Pharmacogenetic studies have established the
polymorphisms. Many drugs that are currently available in
importance of polymorphic drug metabolizing enzymes such
market are “one size fits all,” and they work differently for
as CYP2D6, a member of cytochrome P450 family; in the
different people. Pharmacogenomics helps to predict who
differential response to drugs (3). Recently, the genetic factors
will respond to a medication, who will not respond at all, and
at the level of drug target or the disease pathway have been
who will have negative side effects. Pharmacogenomics aims
identified. For example, ApoE4, an allele at the apolipoprotien
to develop effective, safe drug and optimize drug therapy
E locus, not only correlates with risk of developing
customized with respect to the patients’ genotype leading
Alzheimer ’s disease but also predicts poor response to
to maximum efficacy and minimal adverse effects (2). Such
cholinesterase treatment (4, 5). Polymorphism within a
approaches promise the beginning of “personalized
disease related gene is predictive of drug response. Each
different disease like cancer, atherosclerosis Alzheimerdisease, HIV/AIDS, asthma and neurodegenerative disorders
*Corresponding author: [email protected] and
have distinct etiologies and therefore, distinct responses to
therapy. That is the basic principle of pharmacogenomics.
2013 Sahoo and Nath; licensee Green Earth Research Foundation. This article distributed under terms of Creative Commons Attribution
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/)
GERF Bulletin of Biosciences 2013, 4(2):11-13 12
Determinants of drug response Pharmacogenetic markers
The efficacy of drug response depends on genetic
DNA genotyping studies evolved from linkage and
differ en ces (polymor ph ism) in dr ug metabolism,
association of complex disease. Linkage studies involve
pharmacokinetic variations and genetic differences in
genotyping families with micro satellite-markers and the goal
mechanism of drugs on its target, pharmacodynamic
is to correlate inheritance of a particular chromosomal region
with inheritance of disease. Association studies correlatethe presence of chromosomal region and a trait (disease or
Pharmacokinetic variations
drug response) in unrelated individuals of a population. Now,the rapid pace of DNA marker discovery together with novel
Isolation and sequencing of DNA clones of drug metabolizing
genotyping techniques permit genome-wide association
enzymes allow the study of catalytic specificity and activity
of many individual drug-metabolizing enzymes. Some of thewidely studied enzymes are cytochrome P450 isoenzymes
These technical considerations favour the use of SNP’s
(CYP 450), N-acetyl transferase (NAT) isoenzymes, the UDP
that are simple base substitutions, occuring within and
glucuronoyl transferase and the methyl transferases. CYP450
outside genes. SNP’s are used as a diagnostic tool to predict
genes is the best studied one, which encode enzymes that
drug response (11, 12, 13). DNA micro arrays (or DNA chips)
influence the metabolism of more than 80 percent of current
are an evolving technology make it easy for doctors to
prescription drugs like, Codeine, clopidogrel, tamoxifen and
examine their patients for the presence of specific SNP’s
warfarin (6,7). For most of the drugs, activity of CYP 450
quickly and affordably. A single micro array can now be
determines how much and how long a drug remains in the
used to screen 1,00,000 SNP’s found in patient’s genome in
body. In humans, six forms of CYP 450 viz; CYP1A2, CYP2C9,
CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1 and CYP3A4 are largelyresponsible for eliminating drugs (8). Individuals who arepoor or slow metabolisers have enzyme deficiency related
Application and uses
polymorphisms and are at an increased risk of concentrationrelated toxicity. While others have polymorphism (e.g., gene
Doctors are starting to use pharmacogenomic information
amplification) that enhance enzyme activity/ levels; they are
to prescribe drugs, but such tests are routine for only a few
characterized as extensive or ultra rapid metabolisers and
diseases like heart disease, cancer, asthma, HIV, depression
can be r esistan t to th er apy. Poor metabolism of
and many other common diseases. In HIV disease, before
prescribing the antiviral drug abacavir (Ziagen), doctors
an tiarr hythmics, an d oth er s that leads to systemic
routinely check the genetic variant of the patient that makes
accumulation and toxicity are linked with polymorphisms in
them more likely to have a bad reaction to the drug. Another
CYP2C19 and glucuronosyl transferase locus UGT2B7; poor
example is the breast cancer drug trastuzumab (Herceptin).
metabolisers of psychotropic drugs such as S-mephenytoin
Her ceptin th er apy wor ks on ly for women h avin g
suffer from drowsiness or more serious side effects which
overproduction of a protein called HER2. US FDA also
are associated with CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 polymorphisms.
recommends genetic testing before giving the chemotherapy
In patients polymorphic for poor metabolisers forms of
drug mercaptopurine (Purinethol) and irinotecan (Camptosar)
CYP2D6, terfenadine competes with erythromycin for
to reduce side effects and increase risk of infection.
CYP3A4, wh ich slows th e br eakdown , leadin g to
Apart from improving use and efficacy of existing drugs,
pharmacogenomics research also leads to the development
Pharmacodynamic variations
of better drugs. Scientists are using genomic information to
Genetic variations in receptor function have been relatively
identify and design drugs aimed at subgroups of patients
rare in healthy individuals. Metabolizing enzymes are low
with specific genetic profiles. Pharmacogenomic tools also
affinity systems and receptors are high affinity systems with
aid in search for drugs that target specific molecular and
specific structural requirements. Mutations in receptors
cellular pathways involved in a disease. Pharmacogenomics
result in individual differences in behaviour and drug
research can be used to develop more personalized and cost-
responses. For example, large variations in efficacy of the
effective strategies for using drugs to improve human health.
psychotropic drug Sumitriptan have been attributed to singleamino acid substitutions in 5-hydroxy tryptamine (5HT)
Pharmacogenomics may help in reviving abandoned drugs.
r eceptor s (4, 10). Th us gen etic var iation in both
For example, development of the beta-blocker drugwon FDA
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors attributes to
approval to treat heart failure. But interest in Gencaro revived
after tests showed that the drug worked well in patients with
13 GERF Bulletin of Biosciences 2013, 4(2):11-13
two genetic variants that regulate heart function (14).
an d Zh on g XB. Gen etic polymorphisms in
Incancer, chemotherapy drugs, gefitinib (Iressa) and erlotinib
cytochr ome P450 oxidor eductase in fluence
(Tarceva), work much better in lung cancer patients whose
tumors have a certain genetic change. On the other hand,
metabolism. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2008;
research has shown that the chemotherapy drugs cetuximab
(Erbitux) and panitumumab (Vecitibix) do not work very well
Gomes AM, Winter S, Klein K, Turpeinen M,
in the 40 percent of colon cancer patients whose tumors
Schaeffeler E, Schwab M and Zanger UM.
have a particular genetic change (4).
Pharmacogenomics of human liver cytochrome P450oxidoreductase: multifactorial analysis and impact
Conclusion
on microsomal drug oxidation. Pharmacogenomics. 2009;10(4):579-599.
Some gene alleles vary in frequency between specificpopulations. These alleles have differential responses to
Evans DA, Manley KA and McKusick VA. Genetic
specific drugs. For example, The beta blocker Atenolol is an
control of isoniazide metabolism in man. Br Med J.
anti-hypertensive medication that is shown to be more
Marshall A. Laying the foundation for personalized
American patients in US. Similarly, antiretroviral drug abcavir
medicines. Nat Biotech. 1997; 15:954-957.
hypersensitivity is strongly associated with SNPs that varies
10. Lichter J and McNamara D. What is in a gene: Using
in frequency between populations. The FDA approval of
genetic information for the design of clinical
specific drugs affecting particular population has produced
trials. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1995; 6:715-717.
a storm of controversy over race-based medicine and genetic
11. Zhao LP, Aragaki C, Hsu L and Quiaoit F. Mapping
stereotyping. It is certain that pharmacogenomics has
of complex tr aits by sin gle-n ucleotide
profound effect on drug usage and development process. It
polymorphism. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63:225-240.
is now very important to have a clear focus on technologies
12. Brookes AJ. The essence of SNP’s. Gene 1999;
and a synchronized multidisciplinary effort. At the same time,
it is also necessary to frame detailed regulatory policies at
13. Hacia JG, Fan JB, Ryder O, Jin L, Edgemon K,
an international level and national level. In developing
Ghandour G, et al . Determination of ancestral alleles
countries, pharmacogenomics is still at nascent stage.
for human single nucleotide polymorphism using
Though the benefits are tremendous, the cost factor to
high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nat Genet.
develop pharmacogenomics based therapy is the major
deterrent. Concerted efforts are necessary from international
bodies, governments, and pharma majors to ensure that highefficacy drugs reach the common man at a feasible price. Reference
Ermak G. Modern Science & Future Medicine(second edition), p.164; 2013.
Becquemont L. Pharmacogenomics of adverse drugr eaction s:
perspectives. Pharmacogenomics. 2009; 10(6):961-969.
Kleyn PW and Veesell ES. Genetic variation as aguide to drug development. Science 1998; 281:1820-1821.
Rap MR and Gorey S. Pharmacogenomics andmodern therapy. Ind. J. Pharm Sci. 2007; 69:167-172.
Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ,Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, et al. Genedose of Apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the riskof Alzheimer ’s disease in late onset families. Science.1993; 261:921-923.
Hart SN, Wang S, Nakamoto K, Wesselman C, Li Y
Shelley is a 32-year-old mother of two beautiful girls. This person grew up with red spots on the face. Since this did not pose any problems, these wereperceived to be freckles that people get in the teenage years, which will eventually go away as the individual, gets older. Unfortunately, this remaineduntil Shelley was much older and was shocked with the diagnosis given by the doctor. The speci
Editor’s Overview THIS TWELFTH ISSUE OF THE International Productivity Monitor , published by the Centre for theStudy of Living Standards, differs from past issues. Five of the six articles address one topic, namelythe impact of the Boskin Commission after one decade on price measurement. A final article dis-cusses the role of information technology in the US growth resurgence. summarizes t