2008sf2a.conf.0391b.dvi

SF2A 2008C. Charbonnel, F. Combes and R. Samadi (eds) THE TIMESCALE FOR GIANT PLANET FORMATION : CONSTRAINTS FROM THE ROTATIONAL EVOLUTION OF EXOPLANET HOST STARS The timescale over which planets may form in the circumstellar disks of young stars is one of the main issues of current planetary formation models. We present here new constraints on planet formationtimescales derived from the rotational evolution of exoplanet host stars.
The time it takes to form giant gaseous planets in the circumstellar disks of young stars is still a poorlyconstrained parameter. On the theoretical side, models predict planet formation timescales in the range from∼1 Myr to 10 Myr, depending on the processes at work (e.g. Ida & Lin 2004; Alibert et al. 2005; Guillot &Hueso 2006; Lissauer & Stevenson 2007). On the observational side, protoplanetary disk lifetimes, as measuredby the decay of either infrared excess (dust) or line emission (gas) in pre-main sequence stars, appear to varyfrom star to star, in the range from ≤1 Myr up to about 10 Myr (e.g. Lawson et al. 2004; Hillenbrand et al.
2005; Jayawardhana et al. 2006; Meyer et al. 2007). Why do some stars dissipate their disk on very shorttimescales while other retain their disk up to ∼10 Myr ? Is rapid disk dissipation the result of prompt planetformation in the disk ? Or, on the contrary, are long-lived disks required to allow for planet formation ? Indirect clues may be gained by investigating the imprint the planet formation process may have left on the properties of exoplanet host stars. Israelian et al. (2004) reported that solar-type stars with massive planetsare more lithium depleted than their siblings without detected massive planets, a result recently confirmed byGonzalez (2008). We investigate here whether enhanced lithium depletion in exoplanet host stars may resultfrom their specific rotational history, which in turn is tightly coupled to the evolution of their circumstellar diskduring the pre-main sequence. In this way, we attempt to relate giant planet formation to lithium abundances,angular momentum evolution, and disk lifetimes.
The rotational evolution of solar-mass stars Figure 1 shows models we developped to investigate the rotational evolution of solar-type stars, from their birthup to the age of the Sun. The models dicussed here were originally developped by Bouvier et al. (1997) andAllain (1998). The rotational evolution of solar-mass stars is driven by a number of physical processes actingover the star’s lifetime. During the early pre-main sequence (PMS), the star is magnetically coupled to itsaccretion disk (cf. Bouvier et al. 2007). As long as this interaction lasts, the star is prevented from spinning up(in spite of contraction) and evolves at constant angular velocity (Matt & Pudritz 2005). The disk lifetime, afree parameter of the model, thus dictates the early rotational evolution of the star. When the disk eventuallydissipates, the star begins to spin up as it contracts towards the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS). Dependingon the initial velocity and disk lifetime, a wide range of rotation rates can be obtained on the ZAMS (Bouvieret al. 1997). The lowest initial velocities and longest disk lifetimes result in the slowest rotation rates on theZAMS. On the opposite, high initial velocities and/or short disk lifetimes lead to fast rotation on the ZAMS.
Finally, as the stellar structure stabilizes on the ZAMS, at an age of about 40 Myr for a solar-mass star, thebraking by a magnetized wind becomes the dominant process and effectively spins the star down on the early 1 Laboratoire d’Astrophysique, Observatoire de Grenoble, Universit´e J. Fourier, CNRS, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble, Cedex 9, France c Soci´et´e Francaise d’Astronomie et d’Astrophysique (SF2A) 2008 main sequence (MS). As the braking rate scales with surface velocity (Kawaler 1988), fast rotators are spundown more efficiently than slow ones, and this leads to a rapid convergence towards uniformly slow rotation bythe age of the Sun. Indeed, after a few Gyr, the surface rotational velocity of solar-type stars has lost memoryof the past rotational history.
Internal differential rotation is an important additional parameter of the model. We consider here a radiative core and a convective envelope that are each in rigid rotation, but whose rotation rate may differ (Allain 1998).
We therefore introduce a coupling timescale between the inner radiative zone and the outer convective envelope, τ , which measures the rate of angular momentum transfer between the core and the envelope (MacGregor & Brenner 1991). A short coupling timescale corresponds to an efficient core-envelope angular momentumtransport and, as a consequence, little internal differential rotation. On the opposite, a long coupling timescaleleads to the developement of a large rotational velocity gradient between the core and the envelope. This modelparameter, τ , governs internal differential rotation, and is therefore expected to be of prime importance for rotationally-induced mixing and associated lithium depletion during the evolution of solar-type stars.
The models are confronted to the observed rotation rates of solar-type stars at various ages (e.g. Irwin et al. 2008). We aim here at reproducing the lower and upper envelopes of the observed rotational distributions,in order to contrast the evolution of slow and fast rotators and relate it to lithium depletion. A model for fastrotators is compared to observations in Fig. 1. Starting from an initial period of 1.2 d, the star remains coupledto its disk for 5 Myr, then spins up to a velocity of order of 160 km s−1 on the ZAMS, and is eventually spundown by a magnetized wind on the MS to the Sun’s velocity. The model reproduces reasonably well the PMSspin up and the rapid MS spin down observed for fast rotators between 5 and 500 Myr. In order to reach suchan agreement, the core-envelope coupling timescale has to be short, τ ∼ 10 Myr, which implies little internal differential rotation in fast rotators.
Fig. 1 also shows a model for slow rotators. The initial period is 10 d and the star-disk interaction lasts for 5 Myr in the early PMS. As the star approaches the ZAMS, both the outer convective envelope and the innerradiative core spin up. Once on the ZAMS, the outer envelope is quickly braked, while the core remains inrapid rotation. This behaviour results from an assumed weak coupling between the core and the envelope, with ∼ 100 Myr. On the early MS, the rapidly-rotating core transfers angular momentum back to the envelope, which explains the nearly constant surface velocity over several 100 Myr in spite of magnetic braking. We thusfind that a long core-envelope coupling timescale is required to account for the observed rotational evolution ofslow rotators, which implies the developement of a large velocity gradient at the core-envelope boundary.
Lithium depletion, rotation, and the lifetime of protoplanetary disks The modeling of the rotational evolution of solar-type stars seems to imply that internal differential rotationis much larger in slow rotators than in fast ones. This should have a strong impact on lithium abundances,as the efficiency of rotationally-induced lithium burning is expected to scale with differential rotation (Zahn2007). This model prediction is supported indeed by measurements of lithium abundances in the Pleiades opencluster, at an age of 100 Myr. Soderblom et al. (1993) found that rapidly rotating solar-type stars in thePleiades exhibit higher lithium abundances than slow rotators, which indicates that lithium depletion alreadytakes place during the PMS/ZAMS, and is more pronounced in slow than in fast rotators.
Different rotational histories may thus be reflected in the lithium abundance pattern of mature solar-type stars, leading to a dispersion of lithium abundances at a given age and mass, long after the circumstellardisks have disappeared. The models above suggest that enhanced lithium depletion is associated to low surfacerotation on the ZAMS. Then, the fact that mature solar-type stars with massive exoplanets are lithium-depletedcompared to similar stars with no planet detection seems to indicate that massive exoplanet hosts had slowrotation rates on the ZAMS.
Why were massive exoplanet host stars slow rotators on the ZAMS ? Two main parameters dictate the rotation rate at the ZAMS : the initial velocity and, most importantly, the disk lifetime. For a given disklifetime, the lower the initial velocity, the lower the velocity on the ZAMS. Conversely, for a given initialvelocity, the longer the disk lifetime, the lower the velocity on the ZAMS. This is because the magnetic star-diskinteraction during the PMS is far more efficient than solar-type winds in extracting angular momentum fromthe star (Bouvier 2007; Matt& Pudritz 2007). Disk lifetimes varying from star to star in the range 1-10 Myr arerequired to account for the distribution of rotational velocities on the ZAMS (Bouvier et al. 1997). Statistically,however, the slowest rotators on the ZAMS are expected to be the stars who had initially low rotation rates and The rotational evolution of exoplanet host stars Fig. 1. Rotational models for slow and fast solar-mass rotators. Data : The 10th and 75th percentiles of the observedrotational period distributions of solar-type stars (0.8-1.1 M⊙) were converted to angular velocity and are plotted asdirect and inverted triangles as a function of time. Individual measurements of rotational periods converted to angularvelocities are also shown in order to illustrate the statistical significance of the various samples. Models : Rotationalevolution models are shown for slow and fast 1 M⊙ rotators. For each model in the upper panel, surface rotation isshown as a solid line, and the rotation of the radiative core by a dashed line. With a core-envelope coupling timescaleτ of only 10 Myr, little differential rotation develops in fast rotators. In contrast, the 100 Myr core-envelope coupling timescale in slow rotators results in a large velocity gradient at the base of the convective zone. A disk lifetime of 5 Myris assumed for both models. Lower panels : The velocity shear at the base of the convective zone (ωrad − ωconv)/ωconv,and the angular momentum transport rate ∆J/τ (g cm2 s−2) from the core to the envelope are shown for slow (solid line) and fast (dotted-dashed line) rotators.
the longest-lived disks. An initially slowly-rotating star with a short-lived disk would strongly spin up duringthe PMS and reach the ZAMS as an intermediate or fast rotator.
Long-lived disks thus appear as a necessary condition for massive planet formation and/or migration on a timescale ≥5 Myr. Long lasting disks may indeed be the common origin for slow rotation on the ZAMS, lithiumdepletion and massive planet formation. Interestingly enough, the Sun hosts massive planets. Even though thesolar system gaseous planets are located further away from the Sun than massive exoplanets are from their hoststars, the Sun is strongly lithium deficient. According to the scenario outlined above, the Sun would thus havebeen a slow rotator on the ZAMS.
Based on what we currently know of the rotational properties of young stars, of the lithium depletion processin stellar interiors and of the angular momentum evolution of solar-type stars, it seems likely that the lithium-depleted content of massive exoplanet host stars is a sequel to their specific rotational history. This historyis predominantly dictated by star-disk interaction during the pre-main sequence. Rotationally-driven lithiumdepletion in exoplanet host stars can be at least qualitatively accounted for by assuming protoplanetary disklifetimes of order of 5-10 Myr. Such long-lived disks may be a necessary condition for planet formation and/ormigration around young solar-type stars, at least for the class of giant exoplanets detected so far. A full accountof this work is given in Bouvier (2008).
Alibert, Y., Mordasini, C., Benz, W., & Winisdoerffer, C. 2005, A&A, 434, 343Allain, S. 1998, A&A, 333, 629Bouvier, J. 2007, IAU Symposium, 243, 231Bouvier, J. 2008, A&A, 489, L53Bouvier, J., Forestini, M., & Allain, S. 1997, A&A, 326, 1023Bouvier, J., Alencar, S. H. P., Harries, T. J., Johns-Krull, C. M., & Romanova, M. M. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, Gonzalez, G. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 928Guillot, T., & Hueso, R. 2006, MNRAS, 367, L47Hillenbrand, L. A. 2005, arXiv:astro-ph/0511083Ida, S., & Lin, D. N. C. 2004, ApJ, 616, 567Irwin, J., Hodgkin, S., Aigrain, S., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 384, 675Israelian, G., Santos, N. C., Mayor, M., & Rebolo, R. 2004, A&A, 414, 601Jayawardhana, R., Coffey, J., Scholz, A., Brandeker, A., & van Kerkwijk, M. H. 2006, ApJ, 648, 1206Kawaler, S. D. 1988, ApJ, 333, 236Lawson, W. A., Lyo, A.-R., & Muzerolle, J. 2004, MNRAS, 351, L39Lissauer, J. J., & Stevenson, D. J. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 591MacGregor, K. B., & Brenner, M. 1991, ApJ, 376, 204Matt, S., & Pudritz, R. E. 2005, ApJl, 632, L135Matt, S., & Pudritz, R. E. 2007, IAU Symposium, 243, 299Meyer, M. R., Backman, D. E., Weinberger, A. J., & Wyatt, M. C. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 573Soderblom, D. R., Jones, B. F., Balachandran, S., et al. 1993, AJ, 106, 1059Zahn, J.-P. 2007, EAS Publications Series, 26, 49

Source: http://sf2a.eu/proceedings/2008/2008sf2a.conf..0391B.pdf