Bardzo tanie apteki z dostawą w całej Polsce kupic levitra i ogromny wybór pigułek.


MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and F. Page 1 of 13 Use of this content is subject to the Terms and Conditions
How to Treat Heliobacter pylori First-Line, Second-Line, and Future Therapies
Gastroenterology Clinics - Volume 29, Issue 4 (December 2000) - Copyright 2000 W. B. Saunders
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-8553%2805%2970145-X
How to Treat Heliobacter pylori
First-Line, Second-Line, and Future Therapies
Francis Megraud 1 MD
Barry J. Marshall
1 Laboratoire de Bacteriologie, Universite Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2 and Hopital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France (FM) 2 NHMRC Helicobacter pylori Research Lab, Department of Microbiology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Address reprint requests to Francis Megraud, MD Laboratoire de Bacteriologie Hopital Pellegrin 33076 Bordeaux cedex France Similar to any bacterial infection, the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection is based on the use of
antimicrobial agents. The first experiments performed during the early years after the discovery of H.
showed that no single agent could achieve its eradication at a sufficient rate. Dual antibiotic
therapy increases the cure rate and avoids the selection of resistant strains. Despite these
improvements, however, dual treatment was not efficient enough to be recommended for routine

An adjuvant therapy is needed, and until now the best adjuvant therapy has comprised drugs that
increase the pH of the stomach (i.e., antisecretory drugs and especially proton-pump inhibitors [PPI])
because most antibiotics have a decreased activity at low pH. [43] Three antibiotics have drawn special
attention: (1) Clarithromycin, the best compound in the macrolide group, but it is costly and selects
resistant strains; (2) amoxicillin, for which resistance is virtually absent, but it has a poor diffusion in
gastric tissue; and (3) metronidazole, which has an excellent diffusion, but it induces and selects
resistant strains. Because of these drawbacks, the success of the first-line therapies in practice is
limited to 70% to 80%. Research now is focused on second-line therapies comprising a combination
of other antibiotics with those previously cited; there is a need for new compounds specific for H.
, which should constitute future therapies.
High-Cost Treatments
Proton-Pump Inhibitor-Based Triple Therapies 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and F. Page 2 of 13 The concept of PPI-based triple therapy was introduced in the early 1990s, at a time when the current dual therapy of omeprazole and amoxicillin, which had produced promising results, showed a lack of reproducibility in certain settings. The first PPI-based triple therapy to be administered was omeprazole and amoxicillin with metronidazole given for 10 days. [36] A new macrolide, clarithromycin, which had shown significant efficacy against H. pylori in the absence of antisecretory drugs, [25] was considered for the triple therapy. In Bologna, Bazzoli et al [5] proposed triple therapy using a low dose of clarithromycin (250 mg twice a day) and a low dose of omeprazole (20 mg every other day) with metronidazole for 7 days. These investigators achieved a high rate of eradication, reaching 100% when they first presented their data. In Bordeaux, another approach was developed to take into account the high rate of H. pylori resistance to metronidazole. The logic was to replace metronidazole with amoxicillin, to which no resistance was then reported; to give higher doses of clarithromycin (500 mg twice a day); and to treat the patient for 10 days. The first clinical trial by Lamouliatte et al [37] was highly successful. These two regimens--called the Italian and French, Bologna and Bordeaux, or Bazzoli and Lamouliatte regimens--are still used mainly with some variation in terms of dosage and length of treatment, and they have superceded the first PPI triple therapy containing amoxicillin and metronidazole. Numerous studies have been performed since 1993 and have produced an impressive database. This article does not consider all the studies but emphasizes the large multicenter studies performed with different PPIs as well as the pool analysis performed by Unge [70] and the meta-analysis performed by Laheij et al. [30] The PPI-based therapies described here as well as the ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based triple therapies described later have been recommended in different consensus conferences around the world. [15] [32] [69] The MACH1 study was the first large multicenter study carried out in Northern Europe comparing several triple therapies with different doses of clarithromycin. The findings confirmed that it was valid to use 250 mg twice a day in the Bazzoli therapy and 500 mg twice a day in the Lamouliatte therapy. All of these regimens were given for 7 days and with a double dose of omeprazole. [40] A similar study was performed in the United Kingdom using lansoprazole (30 mg twice a day) instead of omeprazole (20 mg twice a day), and equally satisfactory results were obtained. [52] Similar results were obtained in Germany when pantoprazole (40 mg twice a day) was used with clarithromycin and metronidazole. [16] The meta-analysis of Laheij et al [30] gives the best value of cure rates that can be obtained because (1) it takes into account all of the published data, (2) the heterogeneity between the studies is modeled by means of an ordinary least-squares regression equation, and (3) the heterogeneity in the precision of the cure rates caused by different study sizes is corrected by applying a weighted regression analysis. The drawback is the inclusion of nonrandomized clinical trials, which may confound the results; however, no statistically significant difference was found between randomized and nonrandomized trials. The inclusion of some abstracts that may carry incomplete data may be criticized. The results according to per protocol or intention to treat are presented in Table 1 . The three therapies had a similar efficacy (<5% difference) with the ranking PPI-clarithromycin-metronidazole greater than PPI-amoxicillin-clarithromycin greater than PPI-amoxicillin-metronidazole. The small differences between the per-protocol and intention-to-treat results are a first indication that the patients do not suffer much from side effects, which would lead them to stop the treatment. TABLE 1 -- ADJUSTED CURE RATES OF PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR TRIPLE THERAPIES AND QUAD
Per Protocol
Drugs Administered
No. Studies
% Cure
No. Studies 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and F. Page 3 of 13 PPI = Proton-pump inhibitor; RBC = ranitidine bismuth citrate.
Data from Laheij RJF, van Rossum LGM, Jansen JBMJ, et al: Evaluation of treatment regimens to cure Helicoanalysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13:857-864, 1999. Because the overall efficacy is incomplete, one may wonder what the causes of failure are. In the meta-analysis, increasing the dose of clarithromycin to 1.5 g significantly improved the cure rate, and this was true for regimens containing clarithromycin and PPI. The difference was greatest for the combination with amoxicillin. Clinical experience using low doses of clarithromycin is especially poor. [34] In contrast, the doses of amoxicillin and metronidazole do not seem to influence the outcome. The optimal duration of treatment remains controversial. In Europe, after the MACH studies and other multicenter studies carried out in the northern part of the continent, recommendations were made in the Maastricht Consensus Report [20A] as well as in consensus statements from different countries to treat patients for 7 days; the corresponding regimens were approved by the respective regulatory authorities. The only exception to this practice is in the United States, where 14-day courses were advocated and subsequently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In the meta-analysis of Laheij et al, [30] treatment duration did not influence the cure rate. Two reports from the United States show an improvement when the treatment including amoxicillin and clarithromycin is given for a longer time: 14 days greater than 10 days greater than 7 days. [31] In France, Lamouliatte et al [38] compared regimens of lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin given for 7 and 10 days and found a significant difference favoring a 10-day duration. Type and Dose of Proton-Pump Inhibitor. The pooled analysis of Unge [70] is presented according to the type of PPI used, in contrast to the analysis of Laheij et al. [30] Among the three combinations, there seems to be a trend for a higher efficacy of omeprazole over pantoprazole and lansoprazole, but the difference is not significant. Increasing the dose of PPI does not seem to improve the cure rate. A high dose of PPI is more important when the amoxicillin and clarithromycin combination is used. When no PPI was administered, these two antibiotics led to only a 25% cure rate in the MACH2 study versus 46% for clarithromycin and metronidazole. [39] Resistance of Helicobacter pylori to Antimicrobial Agents. The impact of resistance on the clinical outcome of treatment is different for metronidazole and clarithromycin.
[47] For metronidazole, despite the presence of resistant strains, a cure rate of 75% can be achieved (i.e., a decrease of 20% compared with the rate observed for susceptible strains). [39] In developed countries, the resistance is no greater than 50%. The impact on the overall success does not exceed a 10% decrease in the 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and F. Page 4 of 13 cure rate for the PPI, clarithromycin, and metronidazole regimens. The impact is greater when clarithromycin is replaced by amoxicillin. [26] The low rate of metronidazole resistance observed in northern Italy [6] may explain why the Bazzoli therapy is so successful in Bologna. In contrast, the impact of clarithromycin resistance is much more important. The cure rate ranges from 0 [35] to50%. [74] The rate of resistance to macrolides still is low, usually ranging from 0 to 15%, with 8% in the United States, [73] 14% in France, [11] but only 2% in Sweden. [39] Only reports comprising large numbers of cases that are representative of the population and lead to narrow confidence intervals should be considered. [44] The impact of this resistance on the overall cure rate varies from a 7% to 15% decrease. If strains are resistant to clarithromycin and metronidazole, however, no eradication can be achieved. A report was published on an H. pylori strain that was resistant to amoxicillin (minimal inhibitory concentration >8 mg/L) and isolated from a patient having received several courses of amoxicillin for a respiratory tract infection. [72] This resistance mechanism has been linked to a mutation on the penicillinbinding protein 1A. [29] Dore et al [20] claim to have isolated amoxicillin-tolerant strains in Sardinia, and the mechanism could be the lack of a certain penicillin-binding protein (penicillin-binding protein [PBP-D]). Strains with a decreased susceptibility to amoxicillin (0.25 or 0.5 mg/L) also have been reported. The impact of these findings on the cure rate is unknown. A wide variety of H. pylori strains exists. Some strains harboring a pathogenicity island (cag PAI) are associated with more severe diseases. Such strains could behave differently with regard to eradication treatment. It has been shown that strains from patients with peptic ulcer disease are easier to eradicate than strains from patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. [27] [71] The authors conducted a multivariate analysis of the risk factors for treatment failure in a large multicenter study involving patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. A heterogeneity was observed with regard to cag status, which was found to be a significant risk factor for failure. This heterogeneity can be explained partially by the increased inflammation generated and possibly by the higher growth rate, two factors that favor the diffusion and action of the antibiotics. [12] In the meta-analysis of Laheij et al, [30] the only important factor associated with differences in cure rates, beside the medication combination, was the country in which the trial took place. Other factors, including smoking, alcohol consumption, and diet as well as the type of strain and the level of resistance to antibiotics, may vary from country to country. Compliance also may be different, geographically speaking, for example, in Europe between Nordic and Mediterranean countries. The side effects of the regimen can influence the compliance. Side effects are in the range of 5% to 20% for the three regimens described, however, and cannot be the reason for this difference. Ranitidine Bismuth Citrate-Based Triple Therapies RBC was developed as a specific drug for the treatment of H. pylori infection. The concept was to associate the well-recognized antisecretory properties of ranitidine with those of bismuth salts (i.e., anti-H. pylori activity and mucoprotective properties). [68] Although there always has been a controversy about whether to consider RBC as a unique entity or as an association of two drugs, it is administered as a unique drug and has a practical interest. RBC per se cannot cure H. pylori infection. It must be used in association with antibiotics. The first combination used and approved in the United States was RBC and clarithromycin given for 2 weeks. [61] Manystudies have since been performed with this dual therapy as well as using a combination of two antibiotics with RBC. The same antibiotics as those combined with PPI essentially have been used: clarithromycin and amoxicillin or clarithromycin and nitroimidazole (metronidazole), usually for 1 week. Laheij et al [30] found an adjusted cure rate according to per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis for the combination clarithromycin and amoxicillin of 87.6% and 81.2% and for the combination clarithromycin and nitroimidazole of 90.7% and 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and F. Page 5 of 13 78.3%. [30] Susceptibility data are available in only a few of these studies, and it is not possible to conclude that the good efficacy is due to the effect on resistant strains, although this may be the case. [22] [62] In a dual-therapy study, RBC and clarithromycin eradicated H. pylori, in contrast to omeprazole and clarithromycin, despite the resistance of the organism to clarithromycin. [46] In vitro data favor the existence of a synergy between RBC and clarithromycin. [42] [51] [55] The combination of RBC, amoxicillin, and tinidazole was used in only one study [65] with a limited efficacy (61% cure rate). Low-Cost Treatments
The treatments previously described are satisfactory in terms of efficacy and safety, but their high cost is a major drawback, essentially resulting from the price of PPI, RBC, and clarithromycin. Given that most people infected with H. pylori are living in developing countries where the amount of money that can be spent on health care is extremely limited, it is important to consider low-cost treatments. In this respect, the standard triple therapy using bismuth salts and other bismuth-based therapies should be recommended. [17] Standard triple treatment was the first effective treatment to be proposed in 1987 [10] and subsequently recommended by a Working Party held at the World Congresses of Gastroenterology in Sydney in 1990. [2] A review by Penston [58] in 1994 included 67 studies and 3287 patients. The global eradication rate was 82% by per-protocol and 72% by intention-to-treat analyses. The scheme using bismuth, amoxicillin, and nitroimidazole was less effective than that of bismuth, tetracycline, and nitroimidazole with eradication rates of 75% and 87%, respectively. Since 1994, this triple therapy has been superceded by PPI-based and RBC-based triple therapies in developed countries as first-line treatment, but it remains an important option in developing countries because of its relatively low cost. Factors Influencing Outcome Linked to the Treatment Regimen. Besides the type of antibiotic used (amoxicillin or tetracycline) as previously mentioned, the duration of the treatment has been tested. No significant difference was found between 1 week, 2 weeks, or more than 2 weeks for both regimens. A treatment given for less than 1 week was significantly less effective. The type of bismuth salt used, mainly colloidal bismuth subcitrate or bismuth subsalicylate, does not seem to influence theoutcome. Major limitations of this treatment are the necessity to take the drugs 4 times a day and the borderline tolerance because of side effects. Penston [58] reported that side effects, including diarrhea, nausea, and a bad taste in the mouth, occurred in 32% of cases and led to stopping the treatment in 4% of patients. Factors Influencing Outcome Linked to the Strain. Currently, tetracycline resistance has been reported in only one strain, [50] and amoxicillin resistance, which has been discussed previously, is limited, if it exists at all. Nitroimidazole resistance is common, especially in tropical countries, where these compounds are used to treat parasitic infections. For example, in six studies in which triple therapies were used for at least 1 week, the eradication rate decreased from 93% (186 of 200 patients) to 40% (44 of 110 patients) [45] in case of resistance to metronidazole. At this stage, no study on the impact of other strain characteristics (e.g., cag status) has been performed. Factors Influencing Outcome Linked to the Patient. Because of the need for 4 daily doses of the drugs, this treatment is not convenient, and compliance usually is unsatisfactory. Graham et al [24] showed that taking less than 65% of the drugs led to a significant decrease inefficacy. No other factors have been shown to have an impact. Other Bismuth-Based Triple Therapies Because of the possible inefficacy of standard triple therapies and especially the impact of metronidazole 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and F. Page 6 of 13 resistance, other antibiotics have been used. One of the most interesting is furazolidone because H. pylori has not yet been found to be resistant to this drug. This compound belongs to the nitrofurane group. It was originally used to treat H. pylori infection in China. [75] Trials have been conducted in South America, especially in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru. Furazolidone was used instead of metronidazole in the standard triple therapy with amoxicillin in 1994 [21] and with tetracycline in 1996. [56] In the pilot study of Segura et al, [67]30 patients were treated with bismuth subcitrate (240 mg twice a day), furazolidone (100 mg daily), and amoxicillin (500 mg daily) for 14 days. Of patients, 86% were cured (95% confidence interval, 65 to 94). All patients completed the study, and the side effects were mild. A similar study was performed in Peru, the difference being that all drugs were given 3 times a day and the bismuth salt was bismuth subsalicylate instead of subcitrate. The eradication rate was 82%, higher than in the arm in which metronidazole was used instead of furazolidone (56%) (P = 0.015). [63] de Idiaquez et al [19] performed a study replacing amoxicillin with tetracycline. The investigators used 4-times-daily dosage but for only 10 days. The per-protocol eradication rate was 91.5% (54 of 59). Other trials using furazolidone also have been performed, but their treatment did not fit the criterion of low cost because they included a PPI and clarithromycin. [41] The bismuth-based and furazolidone-based triple therapies were recommended as first-line therapies at the Latin American Consensus Conference held in February 1999. [13] Pragmatic Approach
The pragmatic approach that most gastroenterologists favor is the use of a quadruple therapy when the first treatment has not been successful. This quadruple therapy consists of the standard triple therapy (including tetracycline) plus a PPI. [9] Quadruple therapy was found to be effective in the first trials performed in the Netherlands, Hong Kong, and Australia and led to an eradication rate of 90% or more regardless of the status of metronidazole resistance. The use of an H -receptor antagonist gives an equivalent result. In the meta-analysis of Laheij et al [30] according to intention to treat and per protocol, the eradication rate with a PPI (26 studies) was 90.6% and 81.7%, respectively, and with an H -receptor antagonist (11 studies) was 89% and 79.6%, respectively. This was the only therapy for which metronidazole resistance did not seem to have any influence. The duration of treatment can be limited to 1 week; an additional week does not improve the result and leads to substantial side effects. [18] The compliance to this complicated therapy should be improved when three of the drugs are available in a single pill. Other Approaches Using Triple Therapies
Given that in developed countries the most commonly used treatment includes clarithromycin and that the selection of resistance to this compound is a major risk factor for failure, it is important in the case of failure to find an alternative to clarithromycin. Publications are limited in this field. A combination of PPI, amoxicillin, and metronidazole could be used. Data from the HOMER study in which different doses of metronidazole were given indicated a trend toward a better efficacy using the highest dose on resistant strains, but the difference was not statistically significant. [3] It also seems realistic under such circumstances to increase the length of treatment from 1 to 2 weeks. This combination currently is being tested in France in a prospective study on eradication failure. The rationale is that the concentration of drug in the mucosa is dose dependent [23] and that there is a continuum of minimal inhibitory concentrations and not a big gap between susceptibility and resistance. [48] Resistance to fluoroquinolones is low in most countries (e.g., 3.4% in France [7] ), and these compounds, the most effective being ciprofloxacin, are potential candidates for second-line treatment. The results have not reached clinicians' expectations, however. Only 25% of the patients were cured with ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice a day), amoxicillin (1 g twice a day), and omeprazole (20 g twice a day). [33] Poor results were obtained when tetracycline was given with amoxicillin in PPI-based or RBC-based triple therapies (eradication rate, 20% to 35%), [59] whereas tetracycline given with metronidazole led to a 91% eradication rate when it was combined with omeprazole. [64] The cure rate was 80% with RBC. [4] All treatments lasted 7 days. However, Cudia et al [14] cured 17 of 19 patients (89.5%) when minocycline (100 mg twice a day) was given with amoxicillin (1 g twice a day) and RBC (400 mg twice a day) (Table 2) . 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and F. Page 7 of 13 TABLE 2 -- ALTERNATIVE TRIPLE THERAPIES WITH PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR OR RANITIDINE BIS
Drugs Administered
Treatment Duration (d)
Eradication Rate (%)
CI = Confidence interval; PPI = proton-pump inhibitor; RBC = ranitidine bismuth citrate.
*Tested after failure of a PPI triple therapy. Furazolidone, the other compound for which no resistance has been found, currently is unavailable in most developed countries and cannot be an alternative. Rifampins are compounds for which resistance is seldom detected in H. pylori. Perri et al [60] proposed a rescue therapy consisting of rifabutin (300 mg every day) given with amoxicillin (1 g twice a day) and pantoprazole (40 mg twice a day) for 10 days. Perri et al [60] cured 79% (95% confidence interval, 64 to 94) of 29 patients treated, and only 4% experienced side effects. A similar regimen was used by Bock et al [8] in which rifabutin was given twice a day for 10 days. These investigators achieved an eradication rate of 85% (17 of 20) despite the fact that these patients previously had received three eradication treatments. No resistance to rifabutin was observed. One of the few trials dealing with retreatment after failure of a PPI-based triple therapy (PPI, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin) used RBC, tetracycline and tinidazole for 2 weeks. The results were good (intention-to-treat, 82%; per protocol 86%) and slightly better than the results of the first-line treatment. The susceptibility data are not available to evaluate the impact on resistant strains. [66] The same regimen was used by Monkemuller and Hirschowitz [53] as a first-line treatment with similar success. Dual Therapy with Proton Pump Inhibitor and Amoxicillin
PPI and amoxicillin dual therapy was the preferred therapy at the beginning of the 1990s. It was abandoned because of the inconsistent results obtained, which were globally inferior to those of PPI-based triple therapies. The reason probably is linked to the pharmacokinetic properties of the compound. In contrast to macrolides, amoxicillin is a strictly extracellular antibiotic (i.e., it diffuses into the gastric mucosa only when it is present in the bloodstream). In contrast to metronidazole, amoxicillin never reaches important concentrations in the gastric mucosa. This compound is interesting because of the apparent absence of resistance in H. pylori, which is currently being debated. A way of solving the pharmacologic problem is to administer amoxicillin parenterally to have a high and constant flow of the compound at the mucosal level that would be sufficient to kill the bacteria. Such a treatment has been performed in a pilot study and has led to satisfactory results. [1] This alternative is not convenient and cannot be used widely. It could be a solution when one is dealing with a serious disease in 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and F. Page 8 of 13 which the eradication of H. pylori is desirable but not achievable by other treatments. An alternative is to give an oral treatment at a high dosage (e.g., omeprazole [40 mg 3 times a day] and amoxicillin [1 g 3 times a day] for 2 weeks). Peitz et al [57] reported an 80% cure rate when they applied this regimen to previous failure cases as well as Jaup, [28] who used only 750 mg of amoxicillin 3 times a day. Many new compounds currently are being evaluated, including macrolides other than clarithromycin (e.g., azithromycin and roxithromycin). The minimal inhibitory concentration of these compounds on H. pylori are inferior to that of clarithromycin. If the right dose and combination can be found, however, it is possible that a satisfactory result could be obtained. In the authors' opinion, the drugs that will emerge in the future most likely will be nitazoxanide, possibly a compound from the ketolide family, and molecules issued from research on genomics. The authors are doubtful about the emergence of treatments based on other concepts such as antiadherent molecules or hyperimmune colostrum. [54] Nitazoxanide
Nitazoxanide is a nitrothiazolamide compound that shares many properties with the nitroimidazoles. It has the advantage of being well tolerated, however, and it does not select H. pylori-resistant strains. In vitro the minimal inhibitory concentrations are close to those of strains susceptible to metronidazole. No resistance has been detected after subsequent passages on agar containing subinhibitory concentrations of nitazoxanide or after failure of a nitazoxanide treatment. In a dose-ranging trial of nitazoxanide with omeprazole, an eradication rate of 83% per protocol was obtained. [49] Large trials are being conducted to confirm these results. Ketolides
Ketolides are derived from the macrolide group of antibiotics. They have been developed to be active against macrolide-resistant bacteria. Some ketolides are active against macrolide-resistant H. pylori, but their minimal inhibitory concentration on susceptible strains is not as good as that of clarithromycin. Trials to test their effectiveness against H. pylori have not been conducted. New Drugs Based on Genomics
New compounds active against H. pylori may emerge from well-known families of antibiotics, such as beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones, or from new antibiotic groups discovered using the classic approach. The complete genomic sequencing of two H. pylori strains has created a new way of finding active drugs, which specifically target certain vital functions of the bacterium. Numerous genes are specific for H. pylori and common to all H. pylori strains. Postgenomic methods, especially using DNA chips, allow an effective screening of these genes. Once their vital role is confirmed by mutagenesis, they can be screened easily against thousands of small chemical molecules using high-throughput technology. This is the beginning of the process of drug discovery in this new era. Numerous trials have been performed during the 1990s to define the optimal therapy for H. pylori infections. The proposed PPI-based and RBC-based triple therapies lead to satisfactory results. Their first drawback is their cost, and for this reason, many infected people who need treatment worldwide cannot benefit from these regimens. Combinations including bismuth salts and furazolidone, although less convenient and inducing more side effects, can achieve the same goal, however. Failures of first-line therapies essentially are due to antimicrobial resistance, which increases with the selection pressure resulting from the use of these drugs. Second-line treatments using antimicrobial agents for which H. pylori resistance is low or nonexistent are being tested to find alternatives to the quadruple 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and F. Page 9 of 13 therapy. Ciprofloxacin or tetracycline administered with amoxicillin and a PPI has not achieved this goal, in contrast to rifabutin. Combinations including metronidazole with amoxicillin and PPI or with tetracycline and RBC also are potential solutions. There is a need for new drugs, which should be highly effective, nonselective of resistant strains, and without side effects, to improve current regimens. These drugs may be the results of postgenomic studies. Recommendations
In case of failure with a metronidazole-based regimen, the clinician should increase the dose of metronidazole and the length of the second-line treatment. In case of failure with a clarithromycin-based regimen, this antibiotic should not be used in the second-line treatment. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be monitored in specialized centers. Ideally, this testing should be performed after failure of a first-line treatment and imperatively after failure with a second-line treatment. A second-line treatment must be given for a longer period than a first-line treatment. Personal Recommendations
Before completing this article, the authors collected personal preferences for retreatment from several experienced clinicians. These were Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten, MD, PhD (Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Halifax, Canada), Loren Laine, MD (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA), David Graham, MD (Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX), and Anthony Axon, MD (General Infirmary, Leeds, UK). Their suggestions corresponded to the recommendations in this article and are summarized in Figure 1 . Before embarking on such retreatment, a patient is presumed to have failed one or (more usually) two initial therapies with omeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, or RBC. Figure 1. Preferences for retreatment of Helicobacter pylori. BID = twice daily; TID = thrice daily; QID = four times daily; PPI = proton-pump 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and. Page 10 of 13 References
1. Adamek RJ, Wegener M, Labenz J, et al: Medium-term results of an oral and intravenous omeprazole/amoxicillin Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 89:39-42, 1994 Abstract 2. Axon A: Helicobacter pylori therapy effect on peptic ulcer disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:131-137, 1991 Citation 3. Bardhan KD, Bayerdorffer E, Delchier JC, et al: Overcoming metronidazole resistance by increased dosage? The HOMER study. Helicobacter, 2000 (in press) 4. Bardhan KD, Moston D, Perry MJ, et al: Ranitidine bismuth citrate with metronidazole and tetracycline is an effective and inexpensive treatment for the eradication of H. pylori. Gastroenterology 114:G0267, 1998 5. Bazzoli F, Zagari RM, Fossi S, et al: Efficacy and tolerability of a short term, low dose triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 104:A40, 1993 6. Bazzoli F, Zagari M, Pozzato P, et al: Evaluation of the short-term low-dose triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori by factorial design in a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 12:439-446, 1998 Abstract 7. Birac C, Bouchard S, Camou C, et al: Six year follow-up of resistance to antibiotics of Helicobacter pylori in Bordeaux, France. Gut 45(suppl 3):A107, 19998. Bock H, Heep M, Lehn N: Rifabutin, amoxicillin and lanzoprazole eradication of H. pylori after multiple therapy failures. Gut 45(suppl 3):A109, 1999 9. Borody TJ, Andrews P, Fracchia G, et al: Omeprazole enhances efficacy of triple therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori. Gut 37:477-481, 1995 10. Borody TJ, Carrick J, Hazell SL: Symptoms improve after the eradication of gastric Campylobacter pyloridis. Med J Aust 146:450-451, 1987 Citation11. Broutet N, Guillon F, Sauty E, et al: Survey of the in vitro susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to antibiotics in France: Preliminary results. Gut 43(suppl 2):A11, 1998 12. Broutet N, Marais A, Liu D, et al: cag negative status: A risk factor for failure of Helicobacter pylori triple therapies in non-ulcer dyspepsia. Gut 43(suppl 2):A79, 1998 13. Coehlo LG, Leon-Barua R, Ramirez-Ramos A, et al: The Latin American Consensus Conference on Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2000 (in press) 14. Cudia B, Romano M, Gioe FP, et al: "Rescue" therapy including ranitidine bismuth citrate + minocycline + amoxicillin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in previous H.p. treatment failure. Gut 41(suppl 1):A103, 1997 15. Current European concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. The Maastricht Consensus Report. Gut 41:8-13, 1997 16. Dammann HG, Folsch UR, Hahn EG, et al: 7 vs 14 day treatment with pantoprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole for cure of H. pylori infection in duodenal ulcer patients. Gut 41(suppl 1):A95, 1997 17. de Boer WA: Bismuth triple therapy: Still a very important drug regimen for curing Helicobacter pylori infection. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:697-700, 1999 Abstract 18. de Boer WA, Driessen WMM, Potters VPJ, et al: Randomized study comparing 1 with 2 weeks of quadruple therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. Am J Gastroenterol 89:1993-1997, 1994 Abstract 19. de Idiaquez D, Bussalleu A, Rodrigo I: Erradicacion de la infeccion por Helicobacter pylori utilizando tetracyclina, furazolidona y bismuto en pacientes dispepticos con o sin ulcera peptica. Rev Gastroent Peru 19:179-194, 1999 20. Dore MP, Osato MS, Realidi G, et al: Amoxicillin tolerance in Helicobacter pylori. J Antimicrob Chemother 43:47-54, 1999 Abstract 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and. Page 11 of 13 20A. European Helicobacter pylori Study Group: Current European concepts on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: The Maastricht consensus report. Gut 41:8-13, 1997 21. Franco JMM, de Castro FJ, Passos MCF, et al: Helicobacter pylori short-term eradication with modified Belo Horizonte scheme. GED 13:81-84, 1994 22. Gisbert JP, Pajares JM, Valle J: Ranitidine bismuth citrate therapy regimens for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: A review. Helicobacter 4:58-66, 1999 Citation 23. Goddard AF, Jessa MJ, Barrett DA, et al: Effect of omeprazole on the distribution of metronidazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin in human gastric juice. Gastroenterology 111:358-367, 1996 Abstract 24. Graham DY, Lew GM, Malaty HM, et al: Factors influencing the eradication of Helicobacter pylori with triple therapy. Gastroenterology 102:493-496, 1992 Abstract 25. Graham DY, Opekun AR, Klein PD: Clarithromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Gastroenterol 46:292-294, 1993 Abstract 26. Houben MHMG, van de Beek D, Hensen EF, et al: A systematic review of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy--the impact of antimicrobial resistance on eradication rates. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13:1047-1056, 1999 Abstract 27. Huang JQ, Hunt RH: Are one-week anti-H. pylori treatments more effective in patients with peptic ulcer disease (PUD) than in those with non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD)? A meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 93:1639, 1998 28. Jaup BH: Dual "rescue" therapy for eradication of H. pylori in previous triple therapy failure. Gut 45(suppl 3):A118, 1999 29. Kusters JG, Schuijffel DF, Gerrits MM, et al: A PBP-la homologue is involved in stable amoxicillin resistance of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 166:G0983, 1999 30. Laheij RJF, van Rossum LGM, Jansen JBMJ, et al: Evaluation of treatment regimens to cure Helicobacter pylori infection--a meta-analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13:857-864, 1999 Abstract 31. Laine L, Estrada R, Trujillo M, et al: Randomized comparison of differing periods of twice-a-day triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 10:1029-1033, 1996 Abstract 32. Lam SK, Talley NJ: Report of the 1997 Asia Pacific Consensus Conference on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:1-12, 1998 Abstract 33. Lamarque D, Tankovic J, Berrhouma A, et al: Triple therapy using ciprofloxacin for eradication of clarithromycin and metronidazole-resistant Helicobacter pylori. Gut 41(suppl 1):A104, 1997 34. Lamouliatte H, the Aquitaine Gastro Association, Megraud F, et al: Comparison of two one-week triple therapies with a low dose of lansoprazole and two low-dose antibiotics in H. pylori eradication: A French study. Gastroenterology 114:G0796, 1998 35. Lamouliatte H, the Aquitaine Gastro Association, Samoyeau R, et al: Double versus single dose of pantoprazole in combination with clarithromycin and amoxicillin for 7 days in eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13:1523-1530, 1999 Abstract 36. Lamouliatte H, Bernard PH, Boulard A, et al: Controlled study of omeprazole-amoxicillin-tinidazole versus ranitidine-amoxicillin-tinidazole in Helicobacter pylori associated duodenal ulcers: Preliminary results. Rev Esp Enf Digest 78(suppl 1):101, 1990 37. Lamouliatte H, Cayla R, Megraud F, et al: Amoxicillin-clarithromycin-omeprazole: The best therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection? Acta Gastroenterol Belg 56:140, 1993 38. Lamouliatte H, Forestier S, Perie F: Lansoprazole 30 mg or 60 mg combined with two antibiotics [amoxicillin and clarithromycin] to eradicate Helicobacter pylori. Gut 43(suppl 2):A80, 1998 39. Lind T, Megraud F, Unge P, et al: The MACH2 study: Role of omeprazole in eradication of Helicobacter pylori with 1-week triple therapies. Gastroenterology 116:248-253, 1999 Abstract 40. Lind T, van Zanten SV, Unge P, et al: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori using one-week triple therapies combining omeprazole with two antimicrobials: The MACH1 study. Helicobacter 3:138-144, 1996 Abstract 41. Liu WZ, Xiao SD, Shi Y, et al: Furazolidone-containing short-term triple therapies are effective in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and. Page 12 of 13 Pharmacol Ther 13:317-322, 1999 Abstract 42. Lopez-Brea M, Domingo D, Sanchez I, et al: Synergism study of ranitidine bismuth citrate and metronidazole against metronidazole-resistant H. pylori clinical isolates. Gastroenterology 112:A201, 1997 43. Megraud F: Adjuvant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: Role of lansoprazole shown in vitro. J Clin Gastroenterol 20(suppl 1):S24-S27, 1995 Abstract 44. Megraud F: Epidemiology and mechanism of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 115:1278-1282, 1998 Citation 45. Megraud F: What is the relevance of resistance of Helicobacter pylori to antimicrobial agents? In Hunt RH, Tytgat GNJ (eds): Helicobacter pylori: Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Cure. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1996, pp 348-356 46. Megraud F, Bouchard S, Birac C, et al: Ranitidine bismuth citrate can help overcome Helicobacter pylori resistance to clarithromycin in vivo. Helicobacter 2000 (in press) 47. Megraud F, Doermann HP: Clinical relevance of resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori: A review of current data. Gut 43:S61-S65, 1998 48. Megraud F, Lehn N, Lind T, et al: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Helicobacter pylori in a large multicenter trial: The MACH 2 study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:2747-2752, 1999 Abstract 49. Megraud F, Occhialini A, Rossignol JF: Nitazoxanide, a potential drug for eradication of Helicobacter pylori with no cross-resistance to metronidazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:1836-2840, 1998 50. Midolo PD, Korman MG, Turnbridge JD, et al: Helicobactor pylori resistance to tetracycline. Lancet 347:1194-1195, 1996 Citation 51. Midolo PD, Lambert JR, Kerr TG: Ranitidine bismuth citrate can overcome in vitro antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori. Gut 41(suppl 1):A12, 199752. Misiewicz JJ, Harris AW, Bardhan KD, et al: One week triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori: A multicenter comparative study. Gut 41:735-739, 1997 53. Monkemuller KE, Hirschowitz BI: Prospective evaluation of ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13:661-665, 1999 Abstract 54. Opekun AR, El-Zimaity HMT, Osato MS, et al: Novel therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13:35-41, 1999 Abstract 55. Osato MS, Graham DY: Ranitidine bismuth citrate enhances clarithromycin activity against clinical isolates of H. pylori. Gastroenterology 112:A1057, 1997 56. Otero W, Gutierrez O: Eradicacion de H. pylori con terapia triple: Bismuto, furazolidona, tetraciclina. Acta Med Col 21:218, 1996 57. Peitz U, Glasbrenner B, Ellenrieder V, et al: Re-treatment of H. pylori infection with high dose omeprazole-amoxicillin after failure with metronidazole- clarithromycin combination. Gut 45(suppl 3):A111, 1999 58. Penston JG: Review article: Helicobacter pylori eradication--understandable caution but no excuse for inertia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 8:369-389, 1994 Abstract 59. Perri F, Clementi V, Festa M, et al: Randomized comparison of amoxicillin-tetracyclin-based triple therapies for H. pylori. Gastroenterology 144:G1054, 1998 60. Perri F, Festa V, Quitadamo M, et al: "RAP" treatment for Helicobacter pylori infected patients after failure of standard triple therapies: A dose-response study. Gut 45(suppl 3):A107, 1999 61. Peterson WL, Ciociola AA, Sykes DL, et al: Ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin is effective in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 10:251-261, 1996 Abstract 62. Pipkin GA, Williamsson R, Wood JR: Review article: One-week clarithromycin triple therapy regimens for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 12:823-837, 1998 Abstract 63. Ramirez-Ramos A, Gilman RH, Leon-Barua R, et al: Rapid recurrence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Peruvian patients after successful eradication. Clin Infect Dis 25:1027-1031, 1997 Abstract 18/06/2011 MD Consult - How to Treat <I>Heliobacter pylori</I> First-Line, Second-Line, and. Page 13 of 13 64. Realdi G, Dore MP, Atzei A, et al: New therapy for H. pylori: Omeprazole-metronidazole-tetracycline and the effect of tetracycline resistance. Gastroenterology 114:G1092, 1998 65. Ricciardello L, Cannizzaro O, D'Angelo A, et al: Assessment of the efficacy and safety of three 7 days eradication regimens containing ranitidine bismuth citrate: Results of an Italian study. Gut 41(suppl 3):A206, 1997 66. Rinaldi V, Zullo A, de Francesco V, et al: Helicobacter pylori eradication with proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies and re-treatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 13:163-168, 1999 Abstract 67. Segura AM, Gutierrez O, Otero W, et al: Furazolidone, amoxycillin, bismuth triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 11:529-532, 1997 Abstract 68. Stables R, Campbell CJ, Clayton NM, et al: Gastric antisecretory, mucosal protective, antipepsin and anti-Helicobacter properties of ranitidin bismuth citrate. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 7:237-246, 1993 Abstract 69. The report of the Digestive Health Initiative International Update on Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 113:S4-S5, 1997 Citation 70. Unge P: Antimicrobial treatment of H. pylori infection--a pooled efficacy analysis of eradication therapies. Eur J Surg 164(suppl 582):16-26, 1998 71. van Doorn LJ, Figueiredo C, Sanna R, et al: Clinical relevance of the cagA, vacA, and iceA status of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 115:58-66, 1998 Abstract 72. van Doorn LJ, Quint WGV, Schneeberger PM, et al: Importance of Helicobacter pylori cagA and vacA status for the efficacy of anti-Helicobacter treatment. Lancet 350:71-72, 1997 73. Weissfeld A, Haber M, Rose P, et al: Geographical distribution in the United States of primary resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in patients infected with Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 112:A328, 1997 74. Wurzer H, Rodrigo L, Stamler D, et al: Short-course therapy with amoxycillin-clarithromycin triple therapy for 10 days (ACT-10) eradicates Helicobacter pylori and heals duodenal ulcer. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 11:943-952, 1997 Abstract 75. Zheng ZT, Wang ZY, Chu YX, et al: Double-blind short-term trial of furazolidone in peptic ulcer. Lancet 1:1048-1049, 1985 Citation Copyright 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. - Bookmark URL: /das/journal/view/0/N/11785524?ja=206189&PAGE=1.html&issn=0889-8553&source= 18/06/2011


Dinsdag 12 november was er weer een ledenbijeenkomst van ypsilon in s”heerhendrikskinderen

Verslag van de ledenbijeenkomst van 12 november 2013 Dinsdag 12 november was er weer een ledenbijeenkomst van Ypsilon in Er was een goede opkomst van ruim 20 mensen. Het onderwerp van deze avond was Antipsychotica, dat zijn medicijnen die helpen tegen De heer Peter Neutelaars, psychiater bij Emergis, hield hierover een korte inleiding en daarna was er ruimte voor vragen en discussie. 10

Microsoft word - davy's tasting packages 2012 pricing

Here at Davy’s we’re passionate about wine and really enjoy being able to pass our knowledge onto our discerning customers. We have put together a number of tasting packages that are both fun and educational. These events are great for getting the team or a group of friends together for a unique experience and can always be followed by some tasty homemade food in one of our wine bars. We have

Copyright © 2010-2014 Medical Articles